Opening Statement from the September 2015 Intelligent Investor
Originally published on September 2, 2015
In late 2014 we warned investors about a new period we expected to begin within one to three years.
Since then we have witnessed several historic events strengthening the argument that this new period has commenced. A brief list of these events is as follows:
1. Soaring Dollar (late-2014 to current)
2. Collapse in Oil Pricing (mid-2014 to current)
3. Soaring Interest Rates in Russia (overnight in November 2014)
4. Swiss Depegging the Franc from Euro (January 2015)
5. Weak & Delayed Response by Oil Industry (2014 to current)
6. Greece’s Bailout Events (2010 to current)
7. China’s Stock Bubble (late-2014 to current)
8. Chinese Government’s Market Interventions (July & Aug 2015)
9. China’s Devaluation of the Yuan (August 11, 2015)
10. China’s Financial System Issues (mid-2013 to current)
The recent global selloff in the capital markets has confirmed the beginning of this new economic period.
In the August 2015 issue of the CCPM Forecaster, when discussing the Chinese economy, stock market bubble and government interventions, we concluded that things were “not going to end well.” We recently witnessed one stage of these dire consequences. After reporting a huge decline (8.3%) in exports for the month of July, China devalued the yuan by 2% on August 11. The following day the yuan was further devalued by nearly 1%.
China’s currency devaluation sparked a sudden collapse in the global capital markets. But the worrisome export data from China was not the sole reason for the devaluation. China has also been experiencing sizable capital outflows due to the yuan’s strength (via its peg to the US dollar). Thus, devaluation makes Chinese exports more competitive, reduces capital outflows and sends a message to international officials, financial institutions and investors that China is making progress towards creating a free floating currency. This will aid its efforts to become a reserve currency. On the other hand, the Chinese government’s recent stock market interventions remain as a concern to those who had hoped China would transition into a free market economy.
Within days of the yuan devaluation, commodities began to sell off hard as investors digested the implications of China’s economic slowdown. Soon after the capital markets followed suit. Then on Monday August 24, 2015 the Dow Jones Industrial Average collapsed by more than 1000 points in premarket trading due to panic selling and programmed order execution by financial institutions.
To read the entire analysis, please log into your account.
This article continues.
To continue viewing this entry please sign in to your Client or Member account.
Restrictions Against Reproduction: No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner and the Publisher.
These articles and commentaries cannot be reposted or used in any publications for which there is any revenue generated directly or indirectly. These articles cannot be used to enhance the viewer appeal of any website, including any ad revenue on the website, other than those sites for which specific written permission has been granted. Any such violations are unlawful and violators will be prosecuted in accordance with these laws.
Article 19 of the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
This publication (written, audio and video) represents the commentary and/or criticisms from Mike Stathis or other individuals affiliated with Mike Stathis or AVA Investment Analytics (referred to hereafter as the “author”). Therefore, the commentary and/or criticisms only serve as an opinion and therefore should not be taken to be factual representations, regardless of what might be stated in these commentaries/criticisms. There is always a possibility that the author has made one or more unintentional errors, misspoke, misinterpreted information, and/or excluded information which might have altered the commentary and/or criticisms. Hence, you are advised to conduct your own independent investigations so that you can form your own conclusions. We encourage the public to contact us if we have made any errors in statements or assumptions. We also encourage the public to contact us if we have left out relevant information which might alter our conclusions. We cannot promise a response, but we will consider all valid information.