Investment Intelligence When it REALLY Matters.
What follows is everything an informed reader needs to understand how Collum thinks, why his predictions always fail, and how the doom ecosystem around him keeps him permanently trapped in a worldview detached from reality.
Collum is not stupid.
He’s academically accomplished in chemistry, a field governed by deterministic laws.
But macroeconomics is not chemistry.
The disconnect between these two domains is the origin of everything that went wrong.
Chemistry:
linear
predictable
stable
governed by fixed laws
Macroeconomics:
nonlinear
probabilistic
adaptive
driven by psychology, liquidity, innovation, and policy
Collum entered the world of macro assuming his intelligence was transferable across disciplines.
It isn’t.
But instead of studying monetary systems, market structure, or financial history, he fell into the gravitational pull of:
Austrian economics
ZeroHedge
the gold-bug ecosystem
anti-Fed ideology
libertarian doom narratives
He absorbed ideology, not economics.
Once someone enters macro through ideology, they spend the rest of their life “finding evidence” to confirm the worldview they started with.
This is precisely what happened to Collum.
Collum’s most famous talking point is the idea that markets are “60–80% overvalued” and “must” revert to some 1950s-style valuation average.
This sounds analytical.
It isn’t.
His valuation framework collapses instantly under scrutiny because it relies on outdated tools applied to a world that no longer exists.
A. He treats valuations as physical laws
Collum assumes:
the CAPE ratio is timeless
Tobin’s Q is immutable
profit margins always revert
mean reversion is “mathematical inevitability”
But valuation metrics aren’t constants — they’re reflections of economic structure. And economic structure has transformed beyond recognition.
B. He ignores structural shifts
Modern markets operate under:
global capital flows
technological scalability
intangible assets
lower discount rates
network effects
higher long-term margins
drastically different sector weights
Collum rejects all of this because it contradicts his ideology.
C. He moralizes valuations
He uses language like:
“insanity”
“delusion”
“madness”
“absurdity”
This is not analytical language.
It is emotional.
When valuations contradict his worldview, he interprets them as a moral failure, not a structural reality.
Collum’s most repeated claim — arguably the centerpiece of his worldview — is that:
“The Fed is powerless.”
He has said it for 15+ years.
Reality disagrees.
The Federal Reserve — love it or hate it — is the most powerful financial institution in the global economy. It influences:
the risk-free rate
credit conditions
asset pricing
liquidity cycles
global dollar demand
crisis stabilization
corporate margins
leverage dynamics
Collum’s insistence that the Fed “can’t stop what’s coming” is not economic insight. It is:
ideology
nostalgia
emotional framing
a refusal to update
Every major crisis of the last two decades — especially 2020 — contradicts his narrative.
When the pandemic hit, Collum declared the Fed helpless.
The Fed then engineered the fastest market recovery in history.
He has never reconciled this failure.
He simply moved on to the next prediction.
This is where Collum’s persona disintegrates completely.
From 2009 to 2025, he has predicted:
imminent collapse every year
market implosion every cycle
the “final phase” repeatedly
systemic breakdown on loop
depression-level conditions several times
catastrophic mean reversion annually
His forecasting accuracy is effectively 0%.
But it’s worse than that.
He’s not just wrong.
He’s perfectly inverted.
If you had taken the opposite of every Collum prediction since the Great Financial Crisis, you would be massively wealthier today.
Meanwhile, investors who followed him:
missed secular bull markets
missed compounding
sat in hard assets during decade-long stagnation
forfeited life-changing returns
This is not a matter of interpretation.
It is a matter of documented performance.
If Collum is so consistently wrong, why is he still everywhere?
Because doom is profitable.
Fear:
captures attention
produces high engagement
keeps viewers returning
drives sales for gold retailers, crisis newsletters, and prepping products
The alternative-finance circuit is engineered to reward:
pessimism
absolutism
anti-Fed rhetoric
collapse predictions
moral outrage
simplicity over nuance
Collum is perfect for this environment:
confident
articulate
ideological
dramatic
consistent in his doom
never introspective
He’s not rewarded for being right.
He’s rewarded for being dramatic.
This ecosystem guarantees he will never update his worldview.
It is financially and socially safer for him to stay wrong forever than to admit error once.
The most revealing part of Collum’s worldview is that it no longer responds to evidence.
His predictions don’t survive because they’re accurate.
They survive because they’re psychologically necessary.
Doom gives Collum:
identity
contrarian status
intellectual ego
audience approval
emotional coherence
the fantasy of prophetic insight
If he admitted he misunderstood:
the Fed
valuations
liquidity
earnings growth
market cycles
…then his entire persona would collapse.
So he can’t.
And he won’t.
His worldview has fused with his identity.
He doesn’t use doom to describe markets.
He uses doom to describe himself.
Mike Stathis, an actual macro analyst with an institutional forecasting background, has dismantled every aspect of Collum’s claims:
valuations
Fed misconceptions
forecasting patterns
historical analog misuse
structural blindspots
Stathis calls out what doom media will never say:
Collum has no track record, no macro training, and no analytical discipline — just confidence and ideology.
This is why their scorecards look like this:
| ATTRIBUTE | COLLUM | STATHIS |
|---|---|---|
| Forecast Accuracy | 5 | 94 |
| Financial Literacy | 20 | 95 |
| Understanding of Monetary Policy | 5 | 96 |
| Analytical Rigor | 10 | 95 |
| Intellectual Honesty | 15 | 94 |
| Track Record | 10 | 98 |
The gap is not marginal — it is catastrophic.
Collum loses every category that matters.
You want the hardest evidence?
Here it is:
If you followed the S&P 500 from 2009–2025, you are wealthy.
If you followed Collum, you missed everything.
The S&P 500:
created enormous wealth
adapted to crises
absorbed shocks
reached repeated all-time highs
reflected technological expansion
Collum’s worldview:
predicted collapse annually
denied every structural change
dismissed every recovery
ignored every liquidity cycle
His model never predicted reality because his model is not a model — it is a narrative.
Here is the full conclusion in plain English:
Dave Collum is not a macro analyst.
He is a doomer personality who confuses ideology with insight and has been wrong for so long that his worldview no longer reflects markets — it reflects psychological necessity.
His errors stem from:
misapplied intelligence
ideological rigidity
anti-Fed obsession
nostalgia for a world that no longer exists
disdain for modern finance
overconfidence inherited from his academic background
psychological need for collapse
a media environment that rewards fear over accuracy
The result is a worldview that:
cannot adapt
cannot learn
cannot self-correct
cannot produce accurate forecasts
cannot explain modern markets
He has cost investors fortunes, misled audiences, and hardened into a persona he no longer controls.
The Collum story is not just about one man.
It is a warning:
Beware of forecasters who offer certainty in a probabilistic world.
Beware of:
doom prophets
ideology-first analysts
confidence without accuracy
academics outside their domain
people who haven’t updated their worldview in 20 years
Beware of anyone who needs markets to collapse in order to feel correct.
Because Collum doesn’t predict collapse.
He depends on collapse.
And that makes him dangerous.
If you want to see the future clearly, study reality — not the worldview of a man who hasn’t been right since the Bush administration.
Copyrights © 2025 All Rights Reserved AVA investment analytics