"Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience." –Mark Twain
If you want to fully understand and appreciate the work of Mike Stathis, from his market forecasts and securities analysis to his political and economic analyses, you will need to learn how to think clearly if you already lack this vital skill.
For many, this will be a cleansing process that could take quite a long time to complete depending on each individual.
The best way to begin clearing your mind is to move forward with this series of steps:
1. GET RID OF YOUR TV SET, AND ONLY USE STREAMING SERVICES SPARINGLY.
2. REFUSE TO USE YOUR PHONE TO TEXT.
3. DO NOT USE A "SMART (DUMB) PHONE" (or at least do not use your phone to browse the Internet unless absolutely necessary).
4. STAY AWAY FROM SOCIAL MEDIA (Facebook, Instagram, Whatsapp, Snap, Twitter, Tik Tok unless it is to spread links to this site).
5. STAY OFF JEWTUBE.
6. AVOID ALL MEDIA (as much as possible).
The cleansing process will take time but you can hasten the process by being proactive in exercising your mind.
You should also be aware of a very common behavior exhibited by humans who have been exposed to the various aspects of modern society. This behavior occurs when an individual overestimates his abilities and knowledge, while underestimating his weaknesses and lack of understanding. This behavior has been coined the "Dunning-Kruger Effect" after two sociologists who described it in a research publication. See here.
Many people today think they are virtual experts on every topic they place importance on. The reason for this illusory behavior is because these individuals typically allow themselves to become brainwashed by various media outlets and bogus online sources. The more information these individuals obtain on these topics, the more qualified they feel they are to share their views with others without realizing the media is not a valid source with which to use for understanding something. The media always has bias and can never be relied on to represent the full truth. Furthermore, online sources are even more dangerous for misinformation, especially due to the fact that search algorithms have been designed to create confirmation bias.
A perfect example of the Dunning-Kruger Effect can be seen with many individuals who listen to talk radio shows. These shows are often politically biased and consist of individuals who resemble used car salesmen more than intellectuals. These talking heads brainwash their audience with cherry-picked facts, misstatements, and lies regarding relevant issues such as healthcare, immigration, Social Security, Medicaid, economics, science, and so forth. They also select guests to interview based on the agendas they wish to fulfill with their advertisers rather than interviewing unbiased experts who might share different viewpoints than the host.
Once the audience has been indoctrinated by these propagandists, they feel qualified to discuss these topics on the same level as a real authority, without realizing that they obtained their understanding from individuals who are employed as professional liars and manipulators by the media.
Another good example of the Dunning-Kruger Effect can be seen upon examination of political pundits, stock market and economic analysts on TV. They talk a good game because they are professional speakers. But once you examine their track record, it is clear that these individuals are largely wrong. But they have developed confidence in speaking about these topics due to an inflated sense of expertise in topics for which they continuously demonstrate their incompetence.
One of the most insightful analogies created to explain how things are often not what you see was Plato's Allegory of the Cave, from Book 7 of the Republic.
We highly recommend that you study this masterpiece in great detail so that you are better able to use logic and reason. From there, we recommend other classics from Greek philosophers. After all, ancient Greek philosophers like Plato and Socrates created critical thinking.
If you can learn how to think like a philosopher, ideally one of the great ancient Greek philosophers, it is highly unlikely that you will ever be fooled by con artists like those who make ridiculous and unfounded claims in order to pump gold and silver, the typical get-rich-quick, or multi-level marketing (MLM) crowd.
If you want to do well as an investor, you must first understand how various forces are seeking to deceive you.
Most people understand that Wall Street is looking to take their money.
But do they really understand the means by which Wall Street achieves these objectives?
Once you understand the various tricks and scams practiced by Wall Street you will be better able to avoid being taken.
Perhaps an even greater threat to investors is the financial media.
The single most important thing investors must do if they aim to become successful is to stay clear of all media.
That includes social media and other online platforms with investment content such as YouTube and Facebook, which are one million times worse than the financial media.
The various resources found within this website address these two issues and much more.
Remember, you can have access to the best investment research in the world. But without adequate judgment, you will not do well as an investor.
You must also understand how the Wall Street and financial media parasites operate in order to do well as an investor.
It is important to understand how the Jewish mafia operates so that you can beat them at their own game.
The Jewish mafia runs both Wall Street and the media. This cabal also runs many other industries.
We devote a great deal of effort exposing the Jewish mafia in order to position investors with a higher success rate in achieving their investment goals.
Always remember the following quotes as they apply to the various charlatans positioned by the media as experts and business leaders.
“Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.” - King James Bible - Matthew 7:15
"It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled." –Mark Twain
It's also very important to remember this FACT. All Viewpoints Are Not Created Equal.
Just because something is published in print, online, or aired in broadcast media does not make it accurate.
More often than not, the larger the audience, the more likely the content is either inaccurate or slanted.
The next time you read something about economics or investments, you should ask the following question in order to determine the credibility of the source.
Is the source biased in any way?
That is, does the source have any agendas which would provide some kind of benefit accounting for conclusions that were made?
Most individuals who operate websites or blogs sell ads or merchandise of some kind. In particular, websites that sell precious metals are not credible sources of information because the views published on these sites are biased and cannot be relied upon.
The following question is one of the first things you should ask before trusting anyone who is positioned as an expert.
Is the person truly credible?
Most people associate credibility with name-recognition. But more often than not, name-recognition serves as a predictor of bias if not lack of credibility because the more a name is recognized, the more the individual has been plastered in the media.
Most individuals who have been provided with media exposure are either naive or clueless. The media positions these types of individuals as “credible experts” in order to please its financial sponsors; those who buy advertisements.
In the case of the financial genre, instead of name-recognition or media celebrity status, you must determine whether your source has relevant experience on Wall Street as opposed to being self-taught. But this is just a basic hurdle that in itself by no means ensures the source is competent or credible.
It's much more important to carefully examine the track record of your source in depth, looking for accuracy and specific forecasts rather than open-ended statements. You must also look for timing since a broken clock is always right once a day. Finally, make sure they do not cherry-pick their best calls. Always examine their entire track record.
Don't ever believe the claims made by the source or the host interviewing the source regarding their track record.
Always verify their track record yourself.
The above question requires only slight modification for use in determining the credibility of sources that discuss other topics, such as politics, healthcare, etc.
We have compiled the most extensive publication exposing hundreds of con men pertaining to the financial publishing and securities industry, although we also cover numerous con men in the media and other front groups since they are all associated in some way with each other.
There is perhaps no one else in the world capable of shedding the full light on these con men other than Mike Stathis.
Mike has been a professional in the financial industry for nearly three decades.
Alhough he publishes numerous articles and videos addressing the dark side of the industry, the core collection can be found in our ENCYCLOPEDIA of Bozos, Hacks, Snake Oil Salesmen and Faux Heroes.
Also, the Image Library contains nearly 8,000 images, most of which are annotated.
At AVA Investment Analytics, we don't pump gold, silver, or equities because we are not promoters or marketers.
We actually expose precious metals pumpers, while revealing their motives, means, and methods.
We do not sell advertisements.
We actually go to great lengths to expose the ad-based content scam that's so pervasive in the world today.
We do not receive any compensation from our content, other than from our investment research, which is not located on this website.
We provide individual investors, financial advisers, analysts and fund managers with world-class research and unique insight.
If you listen to the media, most likely at minimum it's going to cost you hundreds of thousands of dollars over the course of your life time.
The deceit, lies, and useless guidance from the financial media is certainly a large contributor of these losses.
But a good deal of lost wealth comes in the form of excessive consumerism which the media encourages and even imposes upon its audience.
You aren’t going to know that you’re being brainwashed, or that you have lost $1 million or $2 million over your life time due to the media.
But I can guarantee you that with rare exception this will become the reality for those who are naïve enough to waste time on media.
It gets worse.
By listening to the media you are likely to also suffer ill health effects through excessive consumption of prescription drugs, and/or as a result of watching ridiculous medical shows, all of which are supportive of the medical-industrial complex.
And if you seek out the so-called "alternative media" as a means by which to escape the toxic nature of the "mainstream" media, you might make the mistake of relying on con men like Kevin Trudeau, Alex Jones, Joe Rogan, and many others.
This could be a deadly decision. As bad as the so-called "mainstream" media is, the so-called "alternative media" is even worse.
There are countless con artists spread throughout the media who operate in the same manner. They pretend to be on your side as they "expose" the "evil" government and corporations.
Their aim is to scare you into buying their alternatives. This addresses the nutritional supplements industry which has become a huge scam.
Why Does the Media Air Liars and Con Men?
The goal of the media is NOT to serve its audience because the audience does NOT pay its bills.
The goal of the media is to please its sponsors, or the companies that spend huge dollars buying advertisements.
And in order for companies to justify these expenses, they need the media to represent their cause.
The media does this by airing idiots and con artists who mislead and confuse the audience.
By engaging in "journalistic fraud," the media steers its audience into the arms of its advertisers because the audience is now misled and confused.
The financial media sets up the audience so that they become needy after having lost large amounts of money listening to their "experts." Desperate for professional help, the audience contacts Wall Street brokerage firms, mutual funds, insurance companies, and precious metals dealers that are aired on financial networks. This is why these firms pay big money for adverting slots in the financial media.
We see the same thing on a more obvious note in the so-called "alternative media," which is really a remanufactured version of the "mainstream media." Do not be fooled. There is no such thing as the "alternative media." It really all the same.
In order to be considered "media" you must have content that has widespread channels of distribution. Thus, all "media" is widely distributed.
And the same powers that control the distribution of the so-called "mainstream media" also control distribution of the so-called "alternative media."
The claim that there is an "alternative media" is merely a sales pitch designed to capture the audience that has since given up on the "mainstream media."
The tactic is a very common one used by con men.
The same tactic is used by Washington to convince naive voters that there are meaningful differences between the nation's two political parties.
In reality, both parties are essentially the same when it comes to issues that matter most (e.g. trade policy and healthcare) because all U.S. politicians are controlled by corporate America. Anyone who tells you anything different simply isn't thinking straight.
On this site, we expose the lies and the liars in the media.
We discuss and reveal the motives and track record of the media’s hand-selected charlatans with a focus on the financial media.
To date, we know of no one who has established a more accurate track record in the investment markets since 2006 than Mike Stathis.
Yet, the financial media wants nothing to do with Stathis.
This has been the case from day one when he was black-balled by the publishing industry after having written his landmark 2006 book, America's Financial Apocalypse.
From that point on, he was black-balled throughout all so-called mainstream media and then even the so-called alternative media.
With very rare exception, you aren't even going to hear him on the radio or anywhere else being interviewed.
Ask yourself why.
You aren't going to see him mentioned on any websites either, unless its by people whom he has exposed.
You aren't likely to ever read or hear of his remarkable investment research track record anywhere, unless you read about it on this website.
You should be wondering why this might be.
Some of you already know the answer.
The media banned Mike Stathis because the trick used by the media is to promote cons and clowns so that the audience will be steered into the hands of the media's financial sponsors - Wall Street, gold dealers, etc.
Because the media is run by the Jewish mafia and because most Jews practice a severe form of tribalism, the media will only promote Jews and gentiles who represent Jewish businesses.
And as for radio shows and websites that either don't know about Stathis or don't care to hear what he has to say, the fact is that they are so ignorant that they assume those who are plastered throughout media are credible.
And because they haven't heard Stathis anywhere in the media, even if they come across him, they automatically assume he's a nobody in the investment world simply because he has no media exposure. And they are too lazy to go through his work because they realize they are too stupid to understand the accuracy and relevance of his research.
Top investment professionals who know about Mike Stathis' track record have a much different view of him. But they cannot say so in public because Stathis is now considered a "controversial" figure due to his stance on the Jewish mafia.
Most people are in it for themselves. Thus, they only care about pitching what’s deemed as the “hot” topic because this sells ads in terms of more site visits or reads.
This is why you come across so many websites based on doom and conspiratorial horse shit run by con artists.
We have donated countless hours and huge sums of money towards the pursuit of exposing the con men, lies, and fraud.
We have been banned by virtually every media platform in the U.S and every website prior to writing about the Jewish mafia.
Mike Stathis was banned by all media early on because he exposed the realities of the United States.
The Jewish mafia has declared war on us because we have exposed the realities of the U.S. government, Wall Street, corporate America, free trade, U.S. healthcare, and much more.
Stathis has also been banned by alternative media because he exposed the truth about gold and silver.
We have even been banned from use of email marketing providers as a way to cripple our abilities to expand our reach.
You can talk about the Italian Mafia, and Jewish Hollywood can make 100s of movies about it.
BUT YOU CANNOT TALK ABOUT THE JEWISH MAFIA.
Because Mr. Stathis exposed so much in his 2006 book America's Financial Apocalypse, he was banned.
He was banned for writing about the following topics in detail: political correctness, illegal immigration, affirmative action, as well as the economic realities behind America's disastrous healthcare system, the destructive impact of free trade, and many other topics. He also exposed Wall Street fraud and the mortgage derivatives scam that would end of catalyzing the worst global crisis in history.
It's critical to note that the widespread ban on Mr. Stathis began well before he mentioned the Jewish mafia or even Jewish control of any kind.
It was in fact his ban that led him to realize precisely what was going on.
We only began discussing the role of the criminality of the Jewish mafia by late-2009, three years AFTER we had been black-listed by the media.
Therefore, no one can say that our criticism of the Jewish mafia led to Mike being black-listed (not that it would even be acceptable).
If you dare to expose Jewish control or anything under Jewish control, you will be black-balled by all media so the masses will never hear the truth.
Just remember this. Mike does not have to do what he is doing.
Instead, he could do what everyone else does and focus on making money.
He has already sacrificed a huge fortune to speak the truth hoping to help people steer clear of fraudsters and to educate people as to the realities in order to prevent the complete enslavement of world citizenry.
Rule #1: Those With Significant Exposure Are NOT on Your Side.
No one who has significant exposure should ever be trusted. Such individuals should be assumed to be gatekeepers until proven otherwise. I have never found an exception to this rule.
Understand that those responsible for permitting or even facilitating exposure have given exposure to specific individuals for a very good reason. And that reason does not serve your best interests.
In short, I have significant empirical evidence to conclude that everyone who has a significant amount of exposure has been bought off (in some way) by those seeking to distort reality and control the masses. This is not a difficult concept to grasp. It's propaganda 101.
Rule #2: Con Artists Like to Form Syndicates.
Before the Internet was created, con artists were largely on their own. Once the Internet was released to the civilian population, con artists realized that digital connectivity could amplify their reach, and thus the effectiveness of their mind control tactics. This meant digital connectivity could amplify the money con artists extract from their victims by forming alliances with other con artists.
Teaming up with con artists leads to a significantly greater volume of content and distraction, such that victims of these con artists are more likely to remain trapped within the web of deceit, as well as being more convinced that their favorite con artist is legit.
Whenever you wish to know whether someone can be trusted, always remember this golden rule..."a man is judged by the company he keeps." This is a very important rule to remember because con men almost always belong to the same network. You will see the same con artists interviewing each other,referencing each other, (e.g. a hat tip) on the same blog rolls, attending the same conferences, mentioning their con artist peers, and so forth.
Rule #3: There's NO Free Lunch.
Whenever something is marketed as being "free" you can bet the item or service is either useless or else the ultimate price you'll pay will be much greater than if you had paid money for it in the beginning.
You should always seek to establish a monetary relationship with all vendors because this establishes a financial link between you the customer and the vendor. Therefore, the vendor will tend to serve and protect your best interests because you pay his bills.
Those who use the goods and services from vendors who offer their products for free will treated not as customers, but as products, because these vendors will exploit users who are obtaining their products for free in order to generate income.
Use of free emails, free social media, free content is all complete garbage designed to obtain your data and sell it to digital marketing firms.
From there you will be brainwashed with cleverly designed ads. You will be monitored and your identity wil eventually be stolen.
Fraudsters often pitch the "free" line in order to lure greedy people who think they can get something for free.
Perhaps now you understand why the system of globalized trade was named "free trade."
As you might appreciate, free trade has been a complete disaster and scam designed to enrich the wealthy at the expense of the poor.
There are too many examples of goods and services positioned as being free, when in reality, the customers get screwed.
Rule #4: Beware of Manipulation Using Word Games.
When manipulators want to get the masses to side with their propaganda and ditch more legitimate alternatives they often select psychologically relevant labels to indicate positive or negative impressions.
For instance, the financial parasites running America's medical-industrial complex have designated the term "socialized medicine" to replace the original, more accurate term, "universal healthcare." This play on words has been done to sway the masses from so much as even investigating universal healthcare, because the criminals want to keep defrauding people with their so-called "market-based" healthcare scam, which has accounted for the number one cause of personal bankruptcies in the USA for many years.
When Wall Street wanted to convince the American people to go along with NAFTA, they used the term "free trade" to describe the current system of trade which has devastated the U.S. labor force.
In reality, free trade is unfair trade and only benefits the wealthy and large corporations.
There are many examples on this play on words such as the "sharing economy" and so on.
Rule #5: Whenever Someone Promotes Something that Offers to Empower You, It's Usually a Scam.
This applies to the life coaches, self-help nonsense, libertarian pitches, FIRE movement, and so on.
If it sounds too good to be true, it usually is.
Unlike what the corporate fascists claim, we DO need government.
And no, you can NOT become financially independent and retire early unless you sell this con game to suckers.
Rule #6: "Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience." –Mark Twain
Following this rule is forcing the small and dewindling group of intelligent people left in the world to cease interacting with people.
You might need to get accustomed to being alone if you're intelligent and would rather not waste your time arguing with someone who is so ignorant, that they have no chance to realize what's really going in this world.
It would seem that Dunning-Kruger has engulfed much of the population, especially in the West.
If you believe anything Martin Armstrong says, you’re either intellectually compromised or hopelessly gullible.
Let’s get the record straight.
First, Armstrong is a convicted felon. He ran a $3 billion Ponzi scheme—one of the largest of its time.
Second, the reason he ran that scheme is simple: he couldn’t generate real profits trading currencies, metals, or commodities, despite promising otherwise.
Third, he falsified performance data in his marketing for years.
Fourth, he flat-out lied to his clients—touting fake profits while their money was being incinerated through bad trades.
Fifth, he lied to regulators and federal authorities about the entire operation.
Sixth, he lied in court, claiming he handed out millions in gold bars and rare coins to who-knows-who.
Seventh, after serving prison time, Armstrong tried to launder his reputation by funding a low-budget documentary filled with falsehoods, portraying himself as some kind of innocent visionary. He claimed he didn’t run a Ponzi scheme, didn’t steal any gold, and was the victim of a government vendetta. Complete fiction.
Unsurprisingly, that PR stunt was amplified by the same ecosystem of gold-pumpers, scammers, and conspiracy pushers who’ve made a career exploiting the paranoid and uninformed. That’s why to this day, many “gold bugs” continue to parrot Armstrong’s delusions.
What’s even more disturbing? The man clearly doesn’t understand even the basics of macroeconomics. I’ve highlighted this before. It’s like watching a Bernie Madoff reboot—minus the brains.
Eighth, Armstrong is flat-out uneducated. He claims he graduated high school, but I’d need to see a diploma before I even consider believing that. Listening to him ramble makes it clear he’s out of his depth.
Worse still, he’s not even good at lying—despite having decades of practice.
If you’re smart, you’ll assume everything Armstrong says is false unless proven otherwise. That’s your default setting. Trust nothing without hard evidence.
Now, Armstrong does have one real skill: he knows how to construct a façade. He fabricates credentials, drops impressive-sounding but vague claims, and builds a persona designed to impress the uninformed. It’s classic con artistry—tailored for suckers.
His entire brand is built on deception, and it’s been propped up by other bad actors who benefit from his nonsense.
Take his most laughable claim: that he’s advised heads of state, central bankers, and top government officials. There’s zero proof. No records. No documentation. Just empty boasts.
Other frauds like Robert Kiyosaki use the same playbook—pretend to be connected, pretend to be an authority, then sell nonsense to desperate people.
And no, Martin, sending a letter to a politician doesn’t mean you “advised” them. Anyone can write a letter. That’s not policy consultation. That’s spam.
You want credibility? Show us real evidence. Show us who you met with, when, and what role you played. Until then, your stories are garbage.
Take the letter Armstrong references to back his claim of having dinner with Donald Trump. It does nothing of the sort. There’s no mention of a meeting, dinner, or any interaction whatsoever. What it does show is Armstrong’s talent for manipulation and deceit.
This is a man whose credibility was vaporized long ago. But thanks to an army of grifters and a gullible audience, he continues to peddle fiction to the same tired crowd that made his scam possible in the first place.
Reference: see here.
Martin Armstrong has even claimed he advised the U.S. government on how to fix Social Security.
That’s right—he wants you to believe he was tapped as a key expert on one of the most complex and politically sensitive policy challenges in the nation. It’s pure fiction.
Like so many of Armstrong’s claims, this one is designed to con low-information audiences into thinking he’s some elite economic strategist. But as usual, there's zero evidence. Just more smoke and mirrors.
Let’s be clear: real experts show results. They post their track records. They let the facts do the talking.
Martin, where’s yours?
In contrast, I outlined a viable Social Security fix as far back as 2006 in my book—America’s Financial Apocalypse—where I also warned about U.S.-China trade risks and predicted the 2008 financial crisis. That’s what real foresight looks like.
Armstrong, on the other hand, has built a career out of tossing out unprovable claims to gullible listeners desperate to believe in something. If his resume were legitimate, he wouldn’t have to spend so much time trying to convince people how “important” he is.
Ask yourself: if Armstrong is the economic genius he pretends to be, why is he always bragging about who he’s supposedly advised?
Why the endless name-dropping?
It’s the same cheap tactic used by Donald Trump—someone else notorious for inflating his worth to gain credibility and secure loans. The playbook is the same: tell people how great you are, over and over, until someone believes it.
But truly successful professionals don’t need to promote themselves like this. They don’t sell corny, overpriced products or try to lure people into garbage events by riding a fake celebrity persona. They back up their expertise with results.
Armstrong won’t post his track record—because it’s trash.
Instead, he relies on a different kind of fraud: manufactured popularity.
He floods the internet with fake accounts to make it look like he’s admired. He posts fabricated praise, phony reviews, and suspiciously glowing YouTube comments to bolster the illusion that he’s respected. It’s astroturfing 101.
And because he parrots the fear-based, gold-pumping script, he gets invited onto sketchy shows run by other disinformation peddlers—people who get paid to sell precious metals or push conspiracies.
I exposed these charlatans years ago—the whole rotten network of gold dealers, apocalypse salesmen, and "economic forecasters" who profit from misleading the public. Armstrong fits perfectly into that ecosystem.
He even manufactures fake “reader questions” on his site—loaded setups that conveniently let him push the same nonsense he and his allies circulate. It's obvious these aren’t real questions from readers—they’re PR talking points disguised as audience interaction.
So who are his allies?
It’s the usual gang: gold shills, clickbait con artists, fear-porn influencers, and grifters who depend on a panicked audience to keep the scam rolling.
Armstrong isn't just lying about his past. He’s still lying—every day—because the lies are profitable.
And until he posts a verified, transparent track record, no one should take a word he says seriously.
The following is an example of Armstrong's fake reader submission farce.
Keep in mind that Armstrong has hundreds of these fake comments he claims were submitted by readers. And I selected the first one I came across.
COMMENT: Mr. Armstrong, At first, I questioned why you were more pro-Putin than the media. But given your reliable forecasting and being renowned for your sources, I kept an open mind. Whilst it is becoming clear that Putin has been going after the people who wanted to nuke and totally invade Ukraine, the media seems to overlook that agenda of invading all of Ukraine. Yevgeny Prigozhin disagreed with Putin on only protecting the Donbas. Igor Girkin, who advocated the invasion of Ukraine, was also arrested. The press even tried to pretend that China’s Xi warned Putin not to use nuclear arms in Ukraine when he was against it. Putin did tell the leader of Chentna that a nuclear on Kyiv was off the table. I can see what you have been pointing out. Putin has been the moderate.
Now the British press is admitting that Ukraine is a disaster. The WSJ also just came out and said the United States knew Ukraine was not up to this offensive. I must say, you and your sources are better than anyone out there. Your comments that you had dinner at Trump’s place when he was president and wanted to exit Afghanistan because he was anti-war were very interesting. You actually have the contacts, not conspiracy theories.
I just wanted to say that now I value your comments more than anyone else.
Keep up the good fight. I hope Scotty does not beam you up just yet.
Paul
REPLY: Thank you. My sources are renowned because they all share the same passion for truth. We all work together, sharing information that is off the grid so-to-speak. We all understand how we are being manipulated by the media, which I am so disappointed in for not being independent. The mainstream media was supposed to protect our liberty – not sell it to the highest bidder. News to them has become opinion – not fact.
Reference: see here.
Tell me this isn't a bogus phantom review posing as a reader comment.
Focus on the words I have underlined.
I'll summarize the psychology of this farce created by Armstrong.
First, the fake comment posted above which was created by Armstrong or one of his accomplices relays the message that Armstrong is a "renowned" forecaster and his forecasts are reliable.
"...your reliable forecasting and being renowned for your sources..."
VERICT: WRONG. Martin Armstrong has proven himself to be a terrible forecaster. To convince people otherwise, he claims he predicted things that he didn't.
Moreover, he frequently makes predictions about things that are already happening so he can later claim he predicted these things.
This is the exact same tactic used by paranoia porn, paid gold-pumper, liar and futurist fraud, Gerald Celente.
Second, the fake comment above relays the notion that Armstrong and his "sources" are superior to the media.
"...you and your sources are better than anyone out there."
"...now I value your comments more than anyone else."
VERDICT: WRONG. Although the media is not reliable, it's one million times more reliable than Armstrong.
Third, the fake comment above relays the notion that Armstrong knows important people and even attended dinner with President Trump. This reinforces Armstrong's long-standing claims of knowing, meeting and advising top governments.
"...you had dinner at Trump’s place when he was president..."
"You actually have the contacts, not conspiracy theories."
VERDICT: ANOTHER LIE BY ARMSTRONG. Ask yourself if Trump would have dinner with a Ponzi scheme felon who wasn't wealthy enough to benefit him.
I can claim I dined with Trump as well.
After all, if Armstrong doesn't need to show proof neither do I, right?
But the difference is that if I had dinner with Trump I probably wouldn't mention it because it has nothing to do with my credibility or what I have to offer in terms of research.
Instead of constantly telling people who I know, the people I've advised, and the things I've done, I focus on showing people my investment research and forecasting track record because that's the only thing that matters.
Fourth, the fake above comment relays the message that Armstrong is some kind of saint who is fighting for the people.
"Keep up the good fight."
"My sources are renowned because they all share the same passion for truth."
VERDICT: Armstrong is not fighting for the people. He's actually the enemy of the people. He's a money worshipper, so all he cares about is doing whatever it takes to extract money from people. Aside from having passion for money, the only other thing I see Armstrong having passion for sure as heck isn't the truth. It's quite the opposite.
Remember, this is a man who lied to investors for years, sending out fake account statements showing profits when in reality he was losing money, $700 million because he had no idea what he was doing. Apparently, his "computer forecasting model" went into hibernation for a few years.
Fifth, Armstrong's reply to the fake comment reinforces the false claim that Armstrong and his sources are superior to the media.
Here, he implies that has some special, secret information.
"information that is off the grid..."
VERDICT: ANOTHER FALSE CLAIM. This tactic used by Armstrong is similar to that used by scam artist and liar Jim Rickards, when he claimed he advised the CIA. Although the media is not reliable, it's one million times more reliable than Armstrong.
Sixth, the fake comment relays the notion that Armstrong and his sources are superior to the mainstream media. This also promotes the false narrative that the alternative media is legit.
"The mainstream media was supposed to protect our liberty..."
VERDICT: ANOTHER FALSE STATEMENT.
Armstrong promotes this nonsense for two reasons.
First. he's part of the alternative media so it positions him on the "right side." It also helps him land for interviews from the alternative media scammers.
Second, his audience follows the alternative media so he's telling them what they want to hear. This makes them trust him more and more likely to pay for his worthless forecasting.
I covered the reality about the media many years ago. In short, although the mainstream media isn't completely accurate, I'd say it's around 80 percent reliable. In contrast, the alternative media is close to 100 percent lies and exaggerations. But at the end of the day, the same mafia who runs the mainstream media also runs the alternative media.
"The mainstream media was supposed to protect our liberty..."
The phrase above also promotes the "liberty (and freedom) pitch which I exposed a decade ago as a hook used by con artists.
Notice how the individual who allegedly submitted the question claims Armstrong's forecasting is "renowned." Armstrong included this false claim in the comment knowing that most people (and especially the low-level suckers who fall for his rubbish) validate someone exclusively by reading reviews and comments, even though they have no idea who the people leaving the reviews and comments are, whether they're credible, sane, intelligent, accurate, or whether the review is fake.
You can see that Armstrong's fake reader submissions provide him with numerous opportunities to make it appear as if the public considers him to be "renowned" and "incredible."
Hence, this gimmick serves as a way for Armstrong to post fake reviews and endorsements disguised as reader submissions.
Also, take note of the depth of the comment.
People don't submit comments like this. They just don't.
If you examine numerous reader comments/questions on Armstrong's site, you'll find that these submissions are almost invariably similar in that they always provide him with a segway to promote himself and all of the false claims he uses to elevate his status. These comments and questions will always praise him and/or reinforce the positive narratives about him that he and other scammers he works with have created.
Please check more of these bogus reader questions from his website, and you will see for yourself they are fake.
You should also take note that most of the fake online comments you'll see regarding Armstrong always make exaggerated claims about him.
And most of these comments have no justification. For instance, a slew of fake comments usually appear after Armstrong has given an interview to some gold pumper on YouTube.
Despite the fact that these interviews are almost always unintelligent ramblings filled with wild conspiracies and open-ended claims, the fake comments will post that he's "incredible," or this was the "best" interview on this topic, despite the fact that he fails to reveal anything relevant to investors.
In fact, many of the fake comments appear to be generic and/or preplanned, similar to what you see from paid commenters/reviewers out of the Philippines and India.
But Armstrong knows his audience, so he tells them what they want to hear. He caters to the Alex Jones, Zero Hedge, gold pumping, paranoia porn crowd which is always looking for reasons to buy gold and silver.
This explains most of the topics and conspiracies he discusses.
He's telling his audience of crack pots what they want to hear.
Let me be crystal clear: in my view, Martin Armstrong has no real ability to forecast anything with any consistent accuracy.
What he does have is a talent for playing psychological games, flip-flopping on positions, and flooding the internet with fake accounts to manipulate public perception.
Instead of focusing on actual analysis, Armstrong devotes most of his time to shady—if not outright illegal—marketing tactics aimed at suckering people into paying for his bogus “Socrates” platform and attending his laughable events.
If he were truly the elite forecaster he claims to be, he’d publish a verified track record of his investment calls for everyone to see—just as I’ve done.
But he won’t. And you already know why.
So, is Martin Armstrong a fraud, a liar, and a scam artist?
Let me ask you this: is the Sun hot?
As for credibility, consider this—he once gave a talk at a Rotary Club in Bangkok.
A Rotary Club?
That alone speaks volumes.
Restrictions Against Reproduction: No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner and the Publisher.
These articles and commentaries cannot be reposted or used in any publications for which there is any revenue generated directly or indirectly. These articles cannot be used to enhance the viewer appeal of any website, including any ad revenue on the website, other than those sites for which specific written permission has been granted. Any such violations are unlawful and violators will be prosecuted in accordance with these laws.
Article 19 of the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
This publication (written, audio and video) represents the commentary and/or criticisms from Mike Stathis or other individuals affiliated with Mike Stathis or AVA Investment Analytics (referred to hereafter as the “author”). Therefore, the commentary and/or criticisms only serve as an opinion and therefore should not be taken to be factual representations, regardless of what might be stated in these commentaries/criticisms. There is always a possibility that the author has made one or more unintentional errors, misspoke, misinterpreted information, and/or excluded information which might have altered the commentary and/or criticisms. Hence, you are advised to conduct your own independent investigations so that you can form your own conclusions. We encourage the public to contact us if we have made any errors in statements or assumptions. We also encourage the public to contact us if we have left out relevant information which might alter our conclusions. We cannot promise a response, but we will consider all valid information.
If you believe anything Martin Armstrong says, you’re either intellectually compromised or hopelessly gullible. Let’s get the record straight. First, Armstrong is a convicted felon. He r......
One would have to be a complete fool to believe anything Armstrong says. Not only is he illiterate and uneducated, he does not even understand the most basic aspects of macroeconomics. He's ev...
When it comes to fabricating wild stories, Martin Armstrong has no limitations. For many years he has been trying to convince people that he is an "important guy," and that he knows many "import...
When it comes to fabricating wild stories, Martin Armstrong has no limitations. For many years he has been trying to convince people that he is an "important guy," and that he knows many "import...
When it comes to fabricating wild stories, Martin Armstrong has no limitations. For many years he has been trying to convince people that he is an "important guy," and that he knows many "import...
The following video and the added commentary was created in 2020 (estimate).
Check out this ridiculous pitch by Armstrong published around 2017. It's filled with low-level graphics, fear-mongering and the type of BS you'd expect from one of the world's biggest fraudsters...
Have you ever noticed how many Jews are always looking for ways to toss in the "Holocaust" myth into their argument? I run across the situation frequently. I've seen it with Doug Casey, Harry Dent,...
If a picture is worth a thousand words, what about few dozen pictures? Here's a Refresher Course on Armstrong via Annotated Images "I was set up because the elites don't......
Members of the charlatan network constantly interview and promote each other, all while passing out false claims about the track records of their peer charlatans. When they interview them they also li...
Martin Armstrong uses all sorts of bull shit tactics to try and claim he predicted this and that. The fact is Armstrong has never predicted anything with any reasonble level of credibility. Below yo......
Related: Moron of the Month: Martin Armstrong Convicted Ponzi scheme crook, failed commodities trader and forecasting charlatan Martin Armstrong continues his desperate campaign to rewrite hi...
In the audio below, Mike tells it like it is in his typical animated, unrehearsed way (warning: if you do not like cursing, please do not listen to this audio). The full version of this article (incl...